Legal Opinion

Nolan v. Lee Ho

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 31, 1990PublishedCited by 187 opinions

1Per curiam

The tragic circumstances underlying this medical malpractice suit do not immediately concern, yet cannot be divorced from, the issue before the Court: whether the trial court acted properly in vacating a final settlement agreement without having first conducted a testimonial hearing.

I

Plaintiff Pauline Nolan is blind, the result of a binary enucleation to remove malignant tumors during her infancy. Pauline’s daughter, Tara, was born on September 22, 1978. When Tara was' nearly a year old, she was diagnosed as having bilateral retinoblastoma, “[a] malignant type of tumor arising from the retina…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lopez v. SwyerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
  2. Jewish Center of Sussex Cty. v. WhaleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  3. Berman v. AllanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  4. Pascarella v. BruckNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983
  5. Jannarone v. WT Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by187 opinions

  1. Brundage v. Estate of CarambioSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2008
  2. Grow Company, Inc. v. ChokshiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2008
  3. Puder v. BuechelSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
  4. Mall Chevrolet Inc v. General Motors LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2024
  5. Thompson v. City of Atlantic CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 2007

182 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API