Legal Opinion

Stevens v. Mulcahy

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 15, 1927PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBraley, J.

The evidence not having been reported and there being no exceptions to his report, the master’s findings — that the allegations in the first and second paragraphs of the bill had been proved — are conclusive. It appears that in reliance upon and induced by representations of the defendant John F. Mulcahy, the owner, the plaintiff pur*118chased at a price of $7,000 a store with fixtures and merchandise and a gasoline station therewith conducted. The defendant also as part of the bargain agreed to transfer to the plaintiff a contract which he had for the purchase of gasoline to be sold at the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United Zinc Companies v. HarwoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  2. Kennedy v. WelchMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  3. Thomas v. BealsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
  4. Tremont Trust Co. v. NoyesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  5. Atkins v. AtkinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Exchange Realty Co. v. BinesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  2. Rudnick v. RudnickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  3. Stetson Press, Inc. v. Bunsen Oil Burner Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  4. New England Trust Co. v. BrightMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  5. Latses v. Nick Floor, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API