Legal Opinion
Rudnick v. Rudnick
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided November 29, 1932PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLummus, J.
On June 24, 1930, the plaintiff exchanged an equity of redemption in real estate owned by her on Winchester Street in Brookline for an equity of redemption in real estate on Winthrop Road in Brookline, owned by the defendant Morris Rudnick, hereinafter called the defendant. The equity of redemption conveyed by the plaintiff to the defendant was worth $1,700, she paid $2,000 in cash, and she gave the defendant a note secured by second mortgage for $2,000 upon the real estate on Winthrop Road received in the exchange, which note and mortgage passed into the hands of an innocent purchaser and…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Berman v. CoakleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
- Cook v. ScheffreenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Day v. MillsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Alpine v. Friend Bros.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
- Bates v. CashmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Long v. GeorgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- Yorke v. TaylorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1955
- City of Boston v. SantosuossoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- City of Boston v. DolanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- Baseball Publishing Co. v. BrutonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.