Legal Opinion
Peter B. v. United States
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 29, 2008No. Civil Action 05-2189 (RWR)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
RICHARD W. ROBERTS, District Judge.
Plaintiff Peter B. 1 brings this action under the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2671 et seq., alleging various acts of tortious conduct by his former employer, the Central Intelligence Agency (“CIA”), that caused him severe emotional distress. The government has moved to dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. In response, the plaintiff urges that limited discovery as to the status of his employment with the CIA is necessary before addressing the government’s motion. Because plaintiffs action would be precluded…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. FaustoSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Coalition for Underground Expansion v. MinetaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
- Art metal-u.s.a., Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
- Ingersoll-Rand Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Coulibaly v. KerryDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Cofield v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Smalls v. EmanuelDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Feldman v. Central Intelligence AgencyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Cornish v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.