Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Bruggeman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 24, 1984PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed February 22, 1983, which ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive benefits, charged him with a recoverable overpayment of benefits and imposed a forfeiture of effective days, f The board found that claimant’s suspension by his employer for criminal misconduct was properly made and that he had violated an implied condition of employment by committing an act involving moral turpitude. Additionally, the board found (1) that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he lost his…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Springer v. WhalenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- In re the Claim of MarkowitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Zazycki v. City of AlbanyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- In re the Claim of GillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
3Cited by11 opinions
- Matter of Sinker (Sweeney)New York Court of Appeals · 1997
- In re the Claim of CummingsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- In re the Claim of RoseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- In re the Claim of Di MaioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- In re the Claim of MoraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.