Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Di Maio
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 4, 2004PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLahtinen, J.
Appeals from five decisions of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed June 3, 2003, which, inter alia, ruled that claimants were disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because they lost their employment as the result of an act constituting a felony in connection with such employment.
Claimants were employed as pari-mutuel betting clerks by the New York State Racing Association (hereinafter NYRA). As part of their duties, they received money from racetrack patrons to place bets and paid out money on winning tickets. They maintained cash boxes and were responsible…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Matter of Sinker (Sweeney)New York Court of Appeals · 1997
- In re the Claim of MarkowitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- In re the Claim of BruggemanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- In re the Claim of GillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- In re the Claim of KearseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sullivan v. SullivanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Matter of Cardillo (Commr. of Labor)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- In re the Claim of EngelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- In re the Claim of EngelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013