Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Rose
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 11, 1993PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
— Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed April 7, 1992, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.
Claimant was employed for over four years as a special officer with the New York City Human Resources Administration. The duties of a special officer, which has the status of a peace officer, involve patrolling and maintaining order in certain government buildings. Upon pleading guilty in North Carolina to a misdemeanor charge involving the possession of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re the Claim of BruggemanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- In re the Claim of GillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- In re the Claim of MoraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re the Claim of LadnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- In re the Claim of VetroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- In re the Claim of ZegarelliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- In re the Claim of DelaneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Matter of Hall (Commr. of Labor)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016