Legal Opinion

Kimbell v. Powell

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 9, 1909PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Leon County. Tried below before Hon. Gordon Boone.

1Opinion of the Court

REESE, Associate Justice.

We are met in limine in this case by a motion presented by appellee to strike from the record the court’s conclusions of law and fact. There is no statement of facts. The record shows original and additional conclusions of law and fact in two separate papers, each duly signed by the trial judge and both, as appears from the record, filed on March 28, 1908. The court adjourned on March 21, 1908. With regard to both of these documents, it is charged in the motion that no order was made allowing the district judge ten days after adjournment to prepare and file such…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hermann v. LikensTexas Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Schleicher, Admr. v. GatlinTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Snow v. StarrCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1889
  4. Ennis Mercantile Co. v. WathenTexas Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Boggess v. HarrisTexas Supreme Court · 1897

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bray v. PetersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  2. Eustis v. FreyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  3. Ft. Worth Pub. Co. v. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  4. Chase-Hackley Piano Co. v. ClymerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API