Legal Opinion

Chase-Hackley Piano Co. v. Clymer

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 20, 1918No. 1301PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal frorq Grayson County Court; Dayton B. Steed, Judge. Action by the Chase-Haekley Piano Company. against W. E. Clymer and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBoyce, J.

Chase-Haekley Piano Company delivered to L. W. Wiley two pianos on contract, which we construe to evidence a consignment for sale. Wiley mortgaged these pianos to appellee Clymer to secure the payment of the individual indebtedness of Wiley to Clymer for money borrowed and represented hy two notes, delivering possession of the pianos to Clymer, to be held until the notes were paid. Wiley represented to Clymer that he was the owner of the pianos, and Clymer made the loan and took the mortgages on the faith of this representation without knowledge that the Chase-Haekley Piano Company had any…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Warner v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
  2. Boggess v. HarrisTexas Supreme Court · 1897
  3. P. J. Willis & Bro. v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Milburn Manufacturing Co. v. PeakTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Neville v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Globe Securities Co. v. Gardner Motor Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API