Legal Opinion

Ft. Worth Pub. Co. v. Armstrong

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 21, 1915No. 5527PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Coleman County ; Jno. W. Goodwin, Judge. Action between the Ft. Worth Publishing Company and Theodore Armstrong. There was a judgment for the latter, and the former appeals. On motion to strike out statement of facts.

1Opinion of the CourtKey, C. J.

In- this case appellee has filed a motion to strike out the statement of facts, for the alleged reason that it was not prepared in the manner required by the statute. It is not an agreed statement of facts, but is accompanied by a certificate of the presiding judge, certifying that:

The parties “having failed to agree upon a statement of facts, and defendant having presented a statement of facts to me, and plaintiff having failed to present a statement of the facts in said cause, from the statement presented and my knowledge of the facts in said cause, I have prepared the foregoing statement…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ennis Mercantile Co. v. WathenTexas Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Boggess v. HarrisTexas Supreme Court · 1897
  3. P. J. Willis & Bro. v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Eaton v. KleinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  5. National Bank of Commerce v. Lone Star Milling Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1912

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. J. B. Farthing Lumber Co. v. IlligCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  2. Buffalo Bayou Co. v. LorentzCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  3. Cussen v. LynchCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  4. Halifax Fire Ins. Co. of Halifax v. Columbian Nat. Fire Underwriters' Agency of ClevelandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  5. Nemir v. BennettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API