Legal Opinion

Eustis v. Frey

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 16, 1918No. 1345PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appellant, W. G. Eustis, presents to this court an application for mandamus to require the judge of the district court trying this case to correct the record therein. It is alleged in the petition for mandamus that the records of the court below and as reproduced In the transcript in this case, now pending on appeal, incorrectly show the real date of the adjournment of the term of the court at which this case was tried and of the date of filing of the findings of facts and conclusions of law, prepared by the trial judge; that as a matter of fact said findings of fact and conclusions of law…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Boggess v. HarrisTexas Supreme Court · 1897
  2. P. J. Willis & Bro. v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Wright v. SwayneTexas Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Neville v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  5. Harris v. StarkTexas Supreme Court · 1908

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Davis v. Wichita State Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  2. Rhoades v. El Paso & S. W. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  3. Shelton v. City of AbileneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  4. Martin v. Perfection Rubber Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  5. Elliott v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API