United States v. Nash
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
2Per curiam
Appellant was convicted of four specifications of unauthorized absence and one specification of larceny, in violation of Articles 86 and 121, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 886 and 921, respectively. We granted review to determine whether the appellant was denied a speedy trial.
The parties stipulated that the appellant’s last period of unauthorized absence terminated on January 21, 1975, when he surrendered to the Shore Patrol in San Diego, California. Appellant was confined by the Shore Patrol on January 21 and 22, and was subsequently returned to the…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. BurtonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1971
- United States v. LowryUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
- United States v. JohnsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
- United States v. SchilfUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
- United States v. ReedUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. SmithU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1985
- United States v. CooleyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2016
- United States v. RobinsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
- United States v. RobinsonU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1988
- United States v. GarnerU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1993