United States v. Johnson
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Ferguson, Senior Judge:
A dismissal of all charges and specifications by the Army Court of Military Review for lack of a speedy trial has prompted the Judge Advocate General of the Army to certify the following two questions pursuant to Article 67(b)(2), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 867(b)(2).
WAS THE COURT OF MILITARY REVIEW CORRECT IN DETERMINING THAT THE ACCUSED’S SUBSEQUENT MISCONDUCT DID NOT DEPRIVE HIM OF THE BENEFIT OF THIS HONORABLE COURT’S RULE IN UNITED STATES V BURTON WHICH REQUIRES THE PROSECUTION TO SUSTAIN AN EXTRA-HEAVY BURDEN OF SHOWING…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. BurtonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1971
- United States v. SmithUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1962
- United States v. MladjenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
- United States v. DavisUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1960
- United States v. MohrUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1972
3Cited by41 opinions
- United States v. MizgalaCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2005
- United States v. LeeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
- United States v. McCallisterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
- United States v. LillyU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1986
- United States v. McClainUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.