Legal Opinion

United States v. Johnson

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided May 9, 1975No. 28,671PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Ferguson, Senior Judge:

A dismissal of all charges and specifications by the Army Court of Military Review for lack of a speedy trial has prompted the Judge Advocate General of the Army to certify the following two questions pursuant to Article 67(b)(2), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 867(b)(2).

WAS THE COURT OF MILITARY REVIEW CORRECT IN DETERMINING THAT THE ACCUSED’S SUBSEQUENT MISCONDUCT DID NOT DEPRIVE HIM OF THE BENEFIT OF THIS HONORABLE COURT’S RULE IN UNITED STATES V BURTON WHICH REQUIRES THE PROSECUTION TO SUSTAIN AN EXTRA-HEAVY BURDEN OF SHOWING…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. BurtonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1971
  2. United States v. SmithUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1962
  3. United States v. MladjenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
  4. United States v. DavisUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1960
  5. United States v. MohrUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1972

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. United States v. MizgalaCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2005
  2. United States v. LeeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  3. United States v. McCallisterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  4. United States v. LillyU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1986
  5. United States v. McClainUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API