Legal Opinion

Wood v. Central Sand & Gravel Co.

District Court, W.D. Tennessee

Decided May 3, 1940No. 98PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Findings of Fact.

MARTIN, District Judge.

The plaintiff, a nightwatchman, brought-his civil action under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 201-219, against the defendants for $876.15 wages, plus a like amount as liquidated damages, and for reasonable attorney’s fees, and costs.

The defendant, Central Sand & Gravel Company, was at the time the plaintiff went to work there a subsidiary corporation of the defendant, Fischer Lime &' Cement. Company, a Tennessee corporation; and, after the surrender of its charter of incorporation on October 31, 1938, continued to conduct its same…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. New York Central Railroad Company v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. Pedersen v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  5. Savage v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Guess v. MontagueCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1943
  2. Fleming v. A. B. Kirschbaum Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
  3. Missel v. Overnight Motor Transp. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1942
  4. Fleming v. Arsenal Bldg. CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
  5. Consolidated Timber Co. v. WomackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1942

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API