Cincinnati, Hamilton & Dayton Railroad v. Voght

Appellee recovered judgment for personal injuries. The complaint is in two paragraphs. The errors assigned question the action of the trial court in overruling appellant’s demurrer to-each- paragraph and overruling its motion for a new trial. It is argued that neither paragraph shows appellant to have been guilty of' negligence tnat proximately caused appellee’s injury.

*666The first paragraph of complaint avers that West street in the city of Indianapolis runs north and south, and at the place where the track used by appellant crossed the street there were a number of other tracks, the most…