Legal Opinion

Indianapolis, Peru, & Chicago Railway Co. v. Anthony

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1873PublishedCited by 23 opinions

From the Howard Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtBuskirk, J.

The appellee sued the appellant, to recover damages for his unlawful and wrongful expulsion from the cars of the appellant by her agents and employees in charge of such train of cars.

The complaint consisted of three paragraphs. The appellant moved to strike out certain portions of each paragraph, but the motion was overruled, and the exception is reserved by a bill' of exceptions. The appellant demurred to each paragraph. The demurrers were overruled, and the appellant excepted, but the assignment of error only calls in question the correctness of the ruling as to the first and second…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Philadelphia & Reading Railroad v. DerbySupreme Court of the United States · 1853
  2. Jeffersonville Railroad v. RogersIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Ramsden v. Boston & Albany RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  4. Evansville & Crawfordsville Railroad v. BaumIndiana Supreme Court · 1866

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Craker v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1875
  2. American Express Co. v. PattersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Evansville & Terre Haute Railroad v. McKeeIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Cincinnati, Hamilton & Indianapolis Railroad v. CarperIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad Haute v. GrahamIndiana Supreme Court · 1874

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API