Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Neff v. Faurote

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1885No. 12,334PublishedCited by 4 opinions

From the Henry Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHowe, J.

The relator of the appellant, the plaintiff below, has assigned the following error upon the record of this cause, namely:

“ The court erred in overruling plaintiff’s (appellant’s) demurrer to the first, second, third, fourth, fifth, sixth and seventh paragraphs of the separate answer of the appellees herein, David M. Brown, John B. Guerin, William H. Lewis, John H. Craynor, George B. Morris, Daniel B. Canaday and Frank J. Hall.”

This assignment of error is joint as to all the paragraphs of answer enumerated therein. It does not call in question the sufficiency or insufficiency of any one of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ketcham v. BarbourIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Indiana, Bloomington & Western Railway Co. v. MaddyIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Hartlep v. ColeIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Chicago & Erie Railroad v. SmithIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
  2. Cambridge Lodge, No. 9, Knights of Pythias v. RouthIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Black v. ThompsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Board of Commissioners v. TrotterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API