Legal Opinion
Board of Commissioners v. Trotter
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided March 29, 1898No. 2,636PublishedCited by 2 opinions
From the Hendricks Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.
— The only assignment of error argued by counsel is in the following form: “The court erred in sustaining the demurrers to first and pecond paragraphs of answer of the board of commissioners of Hendricks county.”
This assignment, it has been held, is joint, and does not present for review the ruling as to the sufficiency of each of the paragraphs severally, but only raises the question as to the sufficiency of the two paragraphs jointly considered. If either' paragraph be bad, the assignment is unavailing. Ketcham v. Barbour, 102 Ind. 576; State, ex rel., v. Faurote, 104 Ind. 287; Noe v. Roll,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Noe v. RollIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
- Ketcham v. BarbourIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Williamson v. BrandenbergIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
- Beatty v. PrudenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895
- Crist v. JacobyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cambridge Lodge, No. 9, Knights of Pythias v. RouthIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
- Hille v. NealeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1904