Legal Opinion

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Hammis

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 2011No. 2009AP468-DPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Per curiam

¶ 1. Attorney James E. Hammis appeals a report filed by Referee Lisa Goldman on January 7, 2010, concluding that Attorney Hammis committed 10 of 13 alleged counts of professional misconduct, recommending this court suspend him for a period of four months, and recommending imposition of costs. Attorney Hammis does not appeal the referee's findings or conclusions of law but seeks a shorter suspension. The Office of Lawyer Regulation (OLR) cross-appeals contending the referee should not have recommended dismissal of one of the disciplinary counts and seeks a longer suspension. The court heard…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against EisenbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Thomas O. MulliganWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Andrew J. BryantWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. David J. WinkelWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Margaret BachWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Hammis (In Re Disciplinary Proceedings Against James Edward Hammis)Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2019

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API