Legal Opinion

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Hammis (In Re Disciplinary Proceedings Against James Edward Hammis)

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 23, 2019No. 2014AP002244-DPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

¶1 Attorney James Edward Hammis has appealed a report filed by Referee Lisa C. Goldman accepting concessions Attorney Hammis made in a stipulation with the Office of Lawyer Regulation (OLR) that he committed 40 counts of professional misconduct and recommending that his license to practice to law in Wisconsin be revoked. In his appeal, Attorney Hammis primarily challenges the sanction recommendation and asserts that an appropriate sanction would be a suspension of his license to practice law in the range of one year.

¶2 Upon careful review of this matter, we uphold all of the referee's…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against WiduleWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against InglimoWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. HammisWisconsin Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Tina M. DahleWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Andrew J. BryantWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Nathan E. DeLaduranteyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2023
  2. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Hammis (In Re Disciplinary Proceedings Against James Edward Hammis)Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API