Legal Opinion
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Thomas O. Mulligan
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided October 8, 2015No. 2013AP002742-DPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Per curiam
¶ 1. Attorney Thomas O. Mulligan appeals a report filed by Referee Robert E. Kinney, concluding that Attorney Mulligan engaged in professional misconduct and recommending that this court suspend his license to practice law in Wisconsin for a period of 18 months, order Attorney Mulligan to make restitution to a client, and impose full costs, which total $17,720.02 as of May 12, 2015. Attorney Mulligan asserts that his admitted ethical violations are de minimus and do not warrant restitution, license suspension, or full costs.
*49¶ 2. Having considered the referee's report and the parties' briefs…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against WiduleWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. GlennCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
- Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against InglimoWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
- In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against CarrollWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
- In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against NussbergerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State ex rel. Counsel for Discipline of the Neb. Supreme Court v. NimmerNebraska Supreme Court · 2018
- State ex rel. Counsel for Dis. v. NimmerNebraska Supreme Court · 2018
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. James E. GatzkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Michael M. KrillWisconsin Supreme Court · 2020
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. MulliganWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.