Legal Opinion
Rush v. Federal National Mortgage Association
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 23, 2016No. Civil Action No. 2015-1569PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Emmet G. Sullivan, United States District Court
Plaintiffs Lawanda Britt (“Ms. Britt”) and Michelle Rush (“Ms. Rush”) (collectively “Plaintiffs”) filed suit against Defendant Federal National Mortgage Association (“Defendant” or “Fannie Mae”) on September 25, 2015. See generally, First Am. Compl., ECF No. 1-2. Plaintiffs allege they were terminated because of religious and racial discrimination, retaliation and other unlawful discrimination. Id. ¶¶ 346-98. Specifically, Ms. Britt alleges four claims: religious discrimination in employment termination in violation of the D.C.…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- University of Tex. Southwestern Medical Center v. NassarSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. AikensSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Congress v. Dist. of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Owens-Hart v. Howard UniversityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Robinson v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Rush v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
- Congress v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.