Legal Opinion
Robinson v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 1, 2017No. Civil Action No. 2015-0444PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Granting in Part and Denying in Part Dependant’s Motion for Summary ■ Judgment
RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge
I. INTRODUCTION
The District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Department uses high-tech cameras to catch traffic offenders without the need for real-time , observation by police officers, To organize the photographs, analyze evidence of violations, and issue citations, the police department created the Automated Traffic Enforcement Unit (“ATEU”). Plaintiff Mai-k Robinson, a Sergeant with the Metropolitan Police Department who has devoted his career to…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Yee v. Massachusetts State PoliceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2019
- Norris v. Wash. Metro. Area Transit Auth.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Robinson v. Dist. of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Bess v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021
- Dale Harrison v. Troy D. Berry, Sheriff of Charles County Sheriff's Office, in his official capacityDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2026
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.