Legal Opinion
Rush v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'n
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided December 1, 2017No. 16-7130PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGMENT
The court considered this appeal on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, and on the briefs and arguments of the parties. The court has accorded the issues full consideration and determined that they do not warrant a published opinion. See Fed. R. App. P. 36; D.C. Cir. R. 36(d). For the reasons stated below, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the judgment of the district court be AFFIRMED.
LaWanda Britt and Michelle Rush used to work for the Federal National Mortgage Association, known as Fannie Mae. They were fired in 2012. Fannie Mae says it fired…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Jane Doe, a Minor Child, by Next Friend, Leslie G. Fein v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Lightfoot v. Cendant Mortg. Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2017
- New Rock Asset Partners, L.P. v. Preferred Entity Advancements, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- Pirelli Armstrong Tire Corporation Retiree Medical Benefits Trust v. RainesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- (SS) Mangrum v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
- Guisbert v. Washington Convention and Sports AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
- Marmaras v. MarafatsosDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
- Sorrell v. Paige Industrial Services, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2021
- Watson v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024