Legal Opinion

Day v. Gold Star Dairy

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 1943No. Docket No. 41, Calendar No. 42,335PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The fact that plaintiff was convicted by a jury in the justice court for reckless driving in violation of the statute, 1 Comp. Laws 1929, § 4696 (Stat. Ann. § 9.1564), is in no sense determinative of his rights under the workmen's compensation act, a civil proceeding in which the judgment of conviction in a criminal case cannot be used as evidence to establish the truth of the facts to be determined therein. Smith v. Brown,2 Mich. 161. See citations in 80 A.L.R. 1145, 130 A.L.R. 690. Whether plaintiff violated the statute in such manner as to make his conduct wilful and intentional* must be…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Clem v. Chalmers Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Fortin v. Beaver Coal Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Gignac v. Studebaker Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Wyma v. Van AnrooyMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  5. In Re Mueller's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Lichon v. American Universal InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Allen v. National Twist Drill & Tool Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Hammons v. City of Highland Park Police DepartmentMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
  4. McDuffie v. Ætna Life InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1957
  5. Aetna Life Insurance Company v. Gussie W. McDuffieCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1960

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API