Day v. Gold Star Dairy
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
The fact that plaintiff was convicted by a jury in the justice court for reckless driving in violation of the statute, 1 Comp. Laws 1929, § 4696 (Stat. Ann. § 9.1564), is in no sense determinative of his rights under the workmen's compensation act, a civil proceeding in which the judgment of conviction in a criminal case cannot be used as evidence to establish the truth of the facts to be determined therein. Smith v. Brown,2 Mich. 161. See citations in 80 A.L.R. 1145, 130 A.L.R. 690. Whether plaintiff violated the statute in such manner as to make his conduct wilful and intentional* must be…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Clem v. Chalmers Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1914
- Fortin v. Beaver Coal Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1922
- Gignac v. Studebaker Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915
- Wyma v. Van AnrooyMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
- In Re Mueller's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Lichon v. American Universal InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1990
- Allen v. National Twist Drill & Tool Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1949
- Hammons v. City of Highland Park Police DepartmentMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
- McDuffie v. Ætna Life InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1957
- Aetna Life Insurance Company v. Gussie W. McDuffieCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1960
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.