Legal Opinion

Allen v. National Twist Drill & Tool Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1949No. Docket No. 31, Calendar No. 43,736PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBushnell, J.

Defendants National Twist Drill & .Tool Company and its insurer seek to have an award of the department of labor and industry vacated on the grounds that plaintiff Joel G-. Allen’s disability, due to silicosis, is only nominal; that he was guilty of wilful and intentional misconduct in failing to wear a mask while engaged in sandblasting, and because the award requires defendants to pay disability benefits for a period longer than 500 weeks.

Allen, after undergoing a pre-employment physical examination, began work for defendant Drill & Tool Company as a general laborer on November 30, 1942. In…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Finch v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Rench v. Kalamazoo Stove & Furnace Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Day v. Gold Star DairyMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Stewart v. Lakey Foundry & MacHine Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Thomas v. Continental Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1946

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Powell v. Casco Nelmor Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Haske v. Transport Leasing, Inc., IndianaMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Holman v. Oriental RefineryNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Frammolino v. Richmond Products Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. Alexander v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1951

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API