Legal Opinion

Gignac v. Studebaker Corp.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1915No. Docket No. 145PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Certiorari to the. Industrial Accident Board. A. Harry Gignac presented his claim for compensation against the Studebaker Corporation and an award was made in claimant’s favor by the Industrial Accident Board. Contestant brings certiorari.

1Opinion of the CourtBrooke, C. J.

The facts involved in this case may be briefly stated as follows: The claimant, a young man about 20 years of age, was employed by the defendant corporation as a checker. At the rear of the plant operated by appellant was a side track of the railroad company, running along the side of the platform where empty cars were placed to be loaded with automobiles. It was claimant’s duty to check each automobile as it was placed in the car. When the string of cars was loaded, it was customary to remove it to another track a short distance away from the platform. On the evening before the accident,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rayner v. Sligh Furniture Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Clem v. Chalmers Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Gonier v. Chase Companies, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
  2. Ætna Life Insurance v. CarrollSupreme Court of Georgia · 1929
  3. Wick v. GunnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  4. Beaudry v. WatkinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Day v. Gold Star DairyMichigan Supreme Court · 1943

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API