Legal Opinion

Fortin v. Beaver Coal Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1922No. Docket No. 43PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Certiorari to Department of Labor and Industry. Rose Fortin and others presented their claim for compensation against the Beaver Coal Company for the accidental death of their decedent in defendant’s employ. From an order awarding compensation, defendant brings certiorari.

1Opinion of the CourtWiest, J.

Earl Fortin, 25 years of age and unmarried, was employed in defendant’s coal mine as a trip rider, and'had worked in the mine 11 years. In the mine, at the foot of a double hoisting shaft, there was a pit known as the sump, to let the bottom of the cages in to bring the floors thereof flush with the floor of the mine. The sump was an open space about 4 feet 10 inches by 6 feet 6 inches and 5 feet deep. Earl Fortin, on the day he was killed, had finished *509his work for the day, and, evidently intending to volunteer his help to the eager, attempted to jump across the sump, and was struck by a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gignac v. Studebaker Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Alexander v. Industrial BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Bay Shore Laundry Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. City of Grand Rapids v. CrockerMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Ætna Life Insurance v. CarrollSupreme Court of Georgia · 1929
  3. Day v. Gold Star DairyMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Potter v. Realty Trust Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. NationsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API