Legal Opinion

Kessinger v. Matulevich

Montana Supreme Court

Decided October 22, 1996No. 96-059PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Nelson

This is an appeal and cross appeal from the Eleventh Judicial District Court, Flathead County. Following a nonjury trial and view of the disputed road, the District Court awarded private prescriptive easement rights to Plaintiffs Roger and Joanne Kessinger, Defendants Donald and Joan Matulevich, and two nonparty witnesses, John Winnie and Tom Beeson, over the disputed road. Plaintiffs appeal and Defendants cross appeal. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

We address the following issues on appeal:

1. Did the District Court err in declaring that a private prescriptive easement had been…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Interstate Production Credit Ass'n v. DesayeMontana Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Public Lands Access Ass'n v. Boone & Crockett Club Foundation, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Warnack v. Coneen Family TrustMontana Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Lemont Land Corp. v. RogersMontana Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Wilson v. ChestnutMontana Supreme Court · 1974

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Brimstone Mining, Inc. v. GlausMontana Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Heller v. GremauxMontana Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Pearson v. Virginia City Ranches Ass'nMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Albert v. HastetterMontana Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Carnahan v. Moriah Property Owners Ass'nIndiana Supreme Court · 1999

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API