Legal Opinion

Pearson v. Virginia City Ranches Ass'n

Montana Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 2000No. 98-703PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Trieweiler

¶1 The Plaintiffs, Carl and Barbara Pearson and Richard and Aide Feskanin, commenced this action for declaratory judgment and injunctive relief in the District Court for the Fifth Judicial District in Madison County. They sought a determination that a bridle path easement existed for the use of all owners in the Virginia City Ranches Subdivision and an injunction enjoining the individual Defendants from obstructing the bridle path easement. The District Court awarded the Plaintiffs partial summary judgment, finding that the filing of the plat for the Virginia City Ranches subdivision created…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Motarie v. Northern Montana Joint Refuse Disposal DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Unified Industries, Inc. v. EasleyMontana Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Ute Park Summer Homes Ass'n v. Maxwell Land Grant Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  4. City of Missoula v. MixMontana Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Halverson v. TurnerMontana Supreme Court · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Montana Power Co. v. Montana Public Service CommissionMontana Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Blazer v. WallMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Broadwater Development, L.L.C. v. NelsonMontana Supreme Court · 2009
  4. MEADOW LAKE ESTATES HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION v. ShoemakerMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Our Lady of the Rockies, Inc. v. PetersonMontana Supreme Court · 2008

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API