Legal Opinion
Bowles v. Edwards Mfg. Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 29, 1944PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RIFKIND, District Judge.
Defendant, appearing specially, moves to dismiss the action for improper venue and to quash the service of process.
The action is by the Price Administrator and the complaint is in two counts: The first for a money judgment for treble damages on account of alleged violations of the Emergency Price Control Act of 1942; and the second for a permanent injunction restraining the defendant from selling in excess of the prices established by Maximum Price Regulation 118. Federal jurisdiction is founded on § 205(c) of the Act, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix § 925 (c).
The moving and…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Southern Photo Materials Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Green v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- People's Tobacco Co. v. American Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co. v. McKibbinSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Frene v. Louisville Cement Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- California Clippers, Inc. v. United States Soccer Football Ass'nDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1970
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. WimerDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1948
- Ideal Toy Corp. v. Kaysam Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961