Legal Opinion
Ideal Toy Corp. v. Kaysam Corp. of America
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 21, 1961PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WEINFELD, District Judge.
The affidavit submitted by the plaintiff’s attorney is inadequate to establish that the defendant, a foreign corporation, was engaged in business in this District sufficient to confer jurisdiction over it, or that Gerry M. Kalmanson was a person upon whom service of process on behalf of defendant was authorized under Rules 4(d) (3) and 4(d) (7) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A.
The defendant has submitted clear and unequivocal affidavits which are not controverted and which establish: that the defendant is a New Jersey corporation with its sole place…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Green v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Latimer v. S/A Industrias Reunidas F. MatarazzoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- Harriett MacInnes and Malcolm D. MacInnes Individually and as Husband and Wife v. Fontainebleau Hotel Corp., Defendant-RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
- Jaftex Corp. v. Randolph Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
- Lopinsky v. Hertz Drive-Ur-Self Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Gentry v. Wilmington Trust CompanyDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1970
- Goldstein v. COMPUDYNE CORPORATIONDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966