Legal Opinion

Rhoades v. Wright

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 1976No. 14159PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAUGHAN, Justice:

On appeal is an order of the trial court vacating a writ of attachment; holding that an “attachment is an improper method to confer jurisdiction in a wrongful death case where the tort sued upon arose in another state”; and that the court had no in rem jurisdiction. We reverse and remand for reinstatement of the writ.

In 1970, Claude Rhoades and James Wright each farmed different parcels of land located in Utah and in Colorado. In April of that year, James Wright shot and killed Claude Rhoades within the state of Colorado. Wright was tried, found guilty, and sentenced to life…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Harris v. BalkSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  3. Ownbey v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  4. Bristol v. BrentUtah Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Wilcox v. Richmond, Fredericksburg & Potomac RailroadDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rhoades v. WrightUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Mannes-Vale, Inc. v. ValeUtah Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Bailey v. Deseret Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Rhoades v. WrightUtah Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Rhoades v. WrightUtah Supreme Court · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API