Mannes-Vale, Inc. v. Vale
Utah Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Plaintiff employer and its insurer, State Insurance Fund, seek reversal of ah Industrial Commission award to Robert Vale for additional medical expense benefits attributed to his injuries sustained in 1968. Plaintiffs claim that an award of further medical benefits is barred because no claim was ever timely filed.
The essential facts are not disputed. On June 3, 1968, employee Robert Vale was injured in an automobile accident while in the course of his employment. Although Vale did not file a formal claim with the Industrial Commission (“Commission”), notice of the injury and a claim for…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Searle Bros. v. SearleUtah Supreme Court · 1978
- Christensen v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1982
- Robertson v. CampbellUtah Supreme Court · 1983
- Kennecott Copper Corp. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1979
- Utah Apex Mining Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1949
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Vigos v. Mountainland Builders, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2000
- Sheppick v. Albertson's, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1996
- Kennecott Corp. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1987
- United Parcel v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1991
- Vigos v. Mountainland Builders, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2000