Ralph Janvey v. Golf Channel, Incorporated
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
JENNIFER WALKER ELROD, Circuit Judge:
This case requires us to interpret and apply the Texas Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (TUFTA) to determine whether the court-appointed receiver of a failed Ponzi scheme can recover nearly six million dollars that the scheme spent advertising on a major cable network. Because Golf Channel failed to proffer any evidence showing that its advertising services provided reasonably equivalent value from the standpoint of Stanford’s creditors, and we have previously held that services furthering a debtor’s Ponzi scheme provide no value to the debtor’s creditors,…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Hirsch v. Arthur Andersen & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Ford Motor Co. v. Texas Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
- Warfield v. ByronCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
- Merrill v. Abbott (In Re Independent Clearing House Co.)District Court, D. Utah · 1987
- Donell v. KowellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ralph S. Janvey, in His Capacity as Court-Appointed Receiver for the Stanford International Bank, Limited Official Stanford Investors Committee v. the Golf Channel, Incorporated Tgc, L.L.C., Doing Business as Golf ChannelTexas Supreme Court · 2016
- Ralph Janvey v. Golf Channel, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
- Kelley v. KaniosDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2019
- Ralph Janvey v. Golf Channel, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
- Kelley v. KaniosDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2019