Legal Opinion

Ralph Janvey v. Golf Channel, Incorporated

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided August 22, 2016No. 13-11305PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Stanford International Bank, Limited paid $5.9 million to The Golf Channel, Inc., in exchange for a range of advertising services aimed at recruiting additional investors into Stanford’s multi-billion dollar Ponzi scheme. 1 After the scheme was uncovered by the SEC and the district court seized Stanford’s assets, the court-appointed receiver filed suit under the Texas Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (TUFTA) to recover the $5.9 million paid to Golf Channel. The district court granted Golf Channel’s motion for summary judgment, having determined that although Stanford’s payments were fraudulent…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  2. Warfield v. ByronCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
  3. Ralph S. Janvey, in His Capacity as Court-Appointed Receiver for the Stanford International Bank, Limited Official Stanford Investors Committee v. the Golf Channel, Incorporated Tgc, L.L.C., Doing Business as Golf ChannelTexas Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Martino v. Edison Worldwide Capital (In Re Randy)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995
  5. Texas Truck Insurance Agency, Inc. v. Cure (In Re Dunham)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Life Partners Creditors' Trust v. Cowley (In Re Life Partners Holdings, Inc.)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
  2. Rasmussen v. SmithDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API