Legal Opinion
Kelley v. Kanios
District Court, D. Maine
Decided May 20, 2019No. Case No. 18-cv-823 (SRN/SER)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
I. BACKGROUND
A. Factual History1
1. Defendants Lend Millions of Dollars to Petters Company, Inc., Between 1997 and 2006, and Receive Millions of Dollars of Interest in Return
Steve Papadimos and Chris Kanios (collectively, "Defendants") are a married *859couple that live in the suburbs of Toledo, Ohio. Papadimos is a government attorney and Kanios is a physician. (See Pl.'s Ex. 30 [Doc. No. 110-3] ("Kanios Dep.") at 6-7.) At some point in 1997, Papadimos heard about an investment opportunity with a Minneapolis businessman named Tom Petters, and, more specifically, with a "diverting" business that…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Arizonans for Official English v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Lehman Brothers v. ScheinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Scholes v. LehmannCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Picard v. Cohmad Securities Corp. (In Re Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Merrill v. Abbott (In Re Independent Clearing House Co.)District Court, D. Utah · 1987
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Douglas A. Kelley v. Gus BoosalisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
- Kelley v. Bmo Harris Bank N.A. (In re Petters Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 2019
- Kelley v. Westford Special Situations Master Fund, L.P.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2020
- ServisFirst Bank v. YoungDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2020