Legal Opinion
Hirsch v. Arthur Andersen & Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided December 28, 1995No. 1121, Docket 94-7669PublishedCited by 408 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MAHONEY, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiff-appellant Hal M. Hirsch appeals from a judgment entered June 15, 1994 in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut, José A. Cabranes, then-Chief Judge,1 that granted the motion of defendants-appellees to dismiss Hirseh’s First Amended Complaint (the “Complaint”) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) on the ground that Hirsch lacked standing to pursue the claims stated in the Complaint. Hirsch also appeals from Judge Cabranes’ ruling entered August 15,1994 that granted Hirsch’s motion for…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Gladstone, Realtors v. Village of BellwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by408 opinions
- L-7 Designs, Inc. v. Old Navy, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- Goldstein v. PatakiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Janvey v. AlguireCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
- Wight v. BankAmerica Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors v. R.F. Lafferty & Co., Inc. Cogen Sklar, L.L.PCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
403 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.