Legal Opinion

Jackson v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, ETC.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1957No. File 9592PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*497ROBERTS, J.

Plaintiff in his complaint for writ of mandamus alleges that he is the owner of a tract of land having no access to a public highway; -that the tract 'containing at least five acres is intended to be used for residential purposes; that on December 7, 1955, plaintiff made application to defendant commissioners of Pennington County to acquire an easement or right of way across adjacent land to reach a public highway, a copy of which application is attached to and made a part of the complaint describing the adjacent land over which a highway may be laid as owned by H. F. Fellows; and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Smith v. GaleSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Horn v. Volcano Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1859
  3. Isaacs v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Jersey Maid Milk Products Co. v. BrockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  5. La Mesa Lemon Grove & Spring Valley Irrigation District v. HalleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Baker v. AtkinsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Arizona Real Estate Department v. Arizona Land Title & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
  3. In Re the Adoption of a Child Known as D.M.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Baker v. AtkinsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  5. In Re the Adoption of a Child Known as D.M.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API