Legal Opinion

O'Donnell v. Moose Hill Orchards, Inc.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided January 31, 1996No. 94-107PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThayer, J.

The plaintiff, Kathy O’Donnell, brought an action against the defendants, Moose Hill Orchards, Inc. d/b/a Macks Apples (Moose Hill), and Andrew Mack, alleging that pesticide spraying in the defendants’ orchards resulted in the illness and death of horses on the plaintiff’s land. A jury returned a verdict in favor of the defendants. On appeal, the plaintiff alleges that the *602Superior Court (McHugh, J.) committed a number of errors regarding the admission of expert testimony. We affirm.

The plaintiff owns a horse farm on which she boards, raises, and breeds thoroughbred race horses. The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hydraform Products Corp. v. American Steel & Aluminum Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
  2. Rix v. Kinderworks Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
  3. Emery v. Tilo Roofing Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1937
  4. State v. ParisSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
  5. Tullgren v. Phil Lamoy Realty Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Wong v. EkbergSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
  2. Baker Valley Lumber, Inc. v. Ingersoll-Rand Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
  3. In re LetendreSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
  4. Laramie v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1998
  5. State v. EschenbrennerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API