Legal Opinion

State v. Eschenbrenner

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided February 8, 2013No. 2011-595PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLynn, J.

Pursuant to RSA 606:10, 111(a) (2001), the State appeals an order of the Superior Court (Nadeau, C.J.) granting the defendant, Patrick Eschenbrenner, a new trial on three counts of aggravated felonious sexual assault, based on the court’s conclusion that the attorneys who represented him at trial provided ineffective assistance of counsel. We reverse.

I

The following facts are drawn from the record of the trial and the hearing on the defendant’s motion for a new trial. In October 1998, C.T., a nine year-old female, told her mother that the defendant had touched her genital area on numerous…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. State v. CresseySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
  3. State v. AyerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
  4. State v. WamalaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
  5. State v. PepinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State of New Hampshire v. Matthew L. TsopasSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2014
  2. State v. Jason WilburSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2018
  3. State v. Jonathan J. MardenSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API