State v. Eschenbrenner
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtLynn, J.
Pursuant to RSA 606:10, 111(a) (2001), the State appeals an order of the Superior Court (Nadeau, C.J.) granting the defendant, Patrick Eschenbrenner, a new trial on three counts of aggravated felonious sexual assault, based on the court’s conclusion that the attorneys who represented him at trial provided ineffective assistance of counsel. We reverse.
I
The following facts are drawn from the record of the trial and the hearing on the defendant’s motion for a new trial. In October 1998, C.T., a nine year-old female, told her mother that the defendant had touched her genital area on numerous…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- State v. CresseySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
- State v. AyerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
- State v. WamalaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
- State v. PepinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State of New Hampshire v. Matthew L. TsopasSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2014
- State v. Jason WilburSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2018
- State v. Jonathan J. MardenSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2019