Legal Opinion

Emery v. Tilo Roofing Co.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided November 2, 1937PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBranch, J.

There was evidence tending to prove the following facts:

Upon August 23, 1934, the plaintiffs, Albert J. and Belle Emery, entered into a written contract with the defendant for the re-roofing of certain buildings in the town of Milford, of which they were the tenants in common. The contract contemplated the laying of composition shingles over the old wooden shingles then in place. The old shingles were at this time in a very dry and highly inflammable condition. Work under this contract was commenced by two of the defendant’s servants upon Monday, May 7, 1934, on the north side of the main…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Jacobs v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Saad v. PapageorgeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1926

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Trans-Global Alloy v. First Nat. BankSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1991
  2. Kierstead v. Betley Chevrolet-Buick, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
  3. Dowling v. L. H. Shattuck, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1941
  4. Goudreault v. KleemanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
  5. Gowen v. BrothersSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API