Legal Opinion
Hydraform Products Corp. v. American Steel & Aluminum Corp.
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided August 16, 1985No. 83-375PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSouter, J.
The defendant, American Steel & Aluminum Corporation, appeals from the judgment entered on a jury verdict against it. The plaintiff, Hydraform Products Corporation, brought this action for direct and consequential damages based on claims of *191negligent misrepresentation and breach of a contract to supply steel to be used in manufacturing woodstoves. American claims that prior to trial, the Superior Court (Nadeau, J.) erroneously held that a limitation of damages clause was ineffective to bar the claim for consequential damages. American further claims, inter alia, that the Trial Court…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Ora Lee Williams v. Walker-Thomas Furniture Company, William Thorne v. Walker-Thomas Furniture CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
- Paul Lewis, D/B/A Lewis Lumber Company v. Mobil Oil Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
- County Asphalt, Inc. v. Lewis Welding & Engineering Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1970
- K & C, Inc. v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- County Asphalt, Inc. v. The Lewis Welding & Engineering CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Great Lakes Aircraft Co. v. City of ClaremontSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
- AM/PM Franchise Ass'n v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Hendricks & Associates, Inc. v. Daewoo CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Snierson v. ScrutonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2000
- Torrance County Mental Health Program, Inc. v. New Mexico Health & Environment DepartmentNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.