Hohnemann v. Pacific Gas and Electric Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtKnight, J.
The trial court denied defendant’s motion to terminate the proceedings instituted by plaintiffs for' the preparation of a transcript on appeal, which plaintiffs had taken pursuant to the alternative method provided by section 953a of the Code of Civil Procedure from a judgment in defendant’s favor after verdict by a jury in an action for damages; and from the order of denial so made defendant has taken this appeal, which plaintiffs now move to dismiss upon, the ground that such an order is not appealable. Defendant contends in opposition to the motion to dismiss that the order in question is…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Lake v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Kaltschmidt v. WeberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Hudgins v. Standard Oil Co. of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Wood v. Peterson Farms Co.California Supreme Court · 1931
- Griess v. State Investment & InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hohnemann v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1939
- Hixson v. HixsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Lande v. Southern California Freight LinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Peebler v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Elliott v. KremerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939