Bristol v. Streibich

Appellants’ counsel frankly state, in opening the argument in their brief: “The principal questions before the court are largely questions of fact rather than questions of law, . . . ” We have found that to be the case, and it is further our opinion that the only substantial question of law presented by the appeal is raised by assignment of error No. 8, which reads as follows:

“The court erred in permitting counsel for plaintiff to ask the leading question set forth (St. 112, Line 25) over the objection of counsel for defendants.”

In the comparatively early case of Harris v. Halverson, 23 Wash.…