Legal Opinion
Knatvold v. Rydman
Washington Supreme Court
Decided June 19, 1947No. 29885PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.
Respondent and appellant E. A. Rydman entered into the following contract:
“This Agreement, dated this 23rd day of March, 1943, by and between Camilla M. Knatvold and E. A. Rydman, Witnesseth:
“That said Rydman will move the oysters from B129, B130 and B131, to B 98, and will harvest the same within the next two years. Rydman will furnish all equipment and labor and the gross proceeds from said oysters will be divided fifty-fifty.
“That said Rydman will break up and scatter the oysters on B61 and 62, furnishing labor and equipment and that said oysters will be harvested within the next two years…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Capital Savings & Loan Ass'n v. ConveyWashington Supreme Court · 1933
- Wiegardt v. BeckenWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- Bristol v. StreibichWashington Supreme Court · 1946
- Hodges v. PriceWashington Supreme Court · 1905
- Dishman v. HuetterWashington Supreme Court · 1906
3Cited by6 opinions
- Barber v. RochesterWashington Supreme Court · 1958
- Malnati v. RamsteadWashington Supreme Court · 1957
- Olson v. ScholesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977
- Shewbridge v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1966
- Shook v. ScottWashington Supreme Court · 1960
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.