Legal Opinion
Terzano v. Clemente
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 25, 1933PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, C. J.
This is an action for the conversion of a Reo motor truck brought against Domenico Clemente and D. A. Scopino, doing business as the Diamond Motor Service. From a judgment for the defendants the plaintiff has appealed. On February 4th, 1928, Clemente was in possession of the truck under a conditional bill of sale. He was indebted to the plaintiff and was otherwise financially embarrassed. On that day he caused to be prepared, and executed, a bill of sale of the truck which purported to sell and convey it to the plaintiff and he and the plaintiff executed a conditional bill of sale which…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bickart v. SanditzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
- First National Bank v. National Grain CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- Hartford-Connecticut Trust Co. v. Puritan Laundry, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
- Williams v. ChadwickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1901
- Ashmead v. KelloggSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1854
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hansel v. Hartford-Connecticut Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
- Pietrantonio v. ScaloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- Colonial Acceptance Corp. v. MessickConnecticut Superior Court · 1935
- Colonial Acceptance Corp. v. MessickPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · 1935