Legal Opinion

Chadha v. Charlotte Hungerford Hospital

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided September 19, 2006No. AC 26971PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LAVINE, J.

The plaintiff, Mohinder P. Chadha, 1 whose license to to practice psychiatry had been suspended, appeals from the summary judgment rendered by the trial court in favor of the defendants, Charlotte Hun-gerford Hospital (hospital), Samuel Langer, Michael Kovaichik, Justin O. Schechter and Robert Stine. 2 On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court (1) abused its discretion when it granted the defendants permission to file a renewed motion for summary judgment, (2) mistakenly concluded that the defendants’ renewed motion for summary judgment was not barred by the doctrines of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bleich v. OrtizSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  2. Chadha v. Charlotte Hungerford HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  3. Rocco v. GarrisonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  4. Advest, Inc. v. WachtelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  5. Mac's Car City, Inc. v. American National BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Grimm v. FoxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
  2. Cohen v. MeyersConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
  3. Tuccio Development, Inc. v. NeumannConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
  4. Gleason v. SmolinskiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014
  5. Anderson v. GORDON, MUIR AND FOLEY, LLPConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API