Legal Opinion
Anderson v. GORDON, MUIR AND FOLEY, LLP
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 17, 2008No. AC 27984PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DiPENTIMA, J.
The plaintiff, Tobias C. Anderson, appeals from the judgment of the trial court rendered following the granting of a motion for summary judgment in favor of the defendants Gordon, Muir & Foley, LLP (law firm), Peter Schwartz and R. Bradley Wolfe. The plaintiff claims that summary judgment was improper because the defendants failed to meet their burden of proving that they were entitled to judgment as a matter of law. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts and procedural history relevant to our disposition of the plaintiffs claim are not in dispute.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ramirez v. Health Net of the Northeast, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Bellemare v. Wachovia Mortgage Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Hudson United Bank v. Cinnamon Ridge Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Yancey v. Connecticut Life & Casualty InsuranceConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Chadha v. Charlotte Hungerford HospitalConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- FCM Group, Inc. v. MillerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- KAIRON v. BurnhamConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Anderson v. GORDON, MUIR AND FOLEY, LLPSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008