Legal Opinion

Gleason v. Smolinski

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided April 8, 2014No. AC34990PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SHELDON, J.

The defendants Janice Smolinski and Paula Bell 1 appeal from the trial court’s judgment in favor of the plaintiff Madeleine Gleason 2 on her claims of intentional infliction of emotional distress and defamation arising from the defendants’ conduct following the disappearance in 2004 of Bill Smolinski, who is Janice Smolinski’s son and Bell’s brother. The defendants make six arguments as to why the judgment of the court should be reversed: (1) the court erred in failing to bar the plaintiffs claims under the first amendment to the United States constitution; (2) the trial…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  2. Snyder v. PhelpsSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. Berry v. LoiseauSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  4. Goodrich v. Waterbury Republican-American, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  5. Daley v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Avery v. MedinaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014
  2. Gleason v. SmolinskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2015
  3. Gleason v. SmolinskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2015
  4. Hartford v. McKeeverSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2014
  5. Nelson v. Tradewind Aviation, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API